5 - Enhanced Interpretations of Vision-logic

In relation to the pre/trans fallacy I maintain that Ken Wilber's approach varies from a vision-logic interpretation of the formop stage (in earlier writing) to a vision-logic interpretation of the vision-logic stage.

It therefore does not represent the enhanced interpretations of vision-logic that are offered through the perspective of the "higher" stages (H1, H2 and H3) and the Radial stages (R1, R2 and R3). (We will comment more on the nature of such enhanced interpretations in later notes!)

In this sense therefore his interpretation can correctly be viewed as a limited use of vision-logic.

Even less can Wilber's use of vision-logic therefore do justice do the (structural) understanding associated directly with the "higher" and radial levels.