29 - Pre/Trans Fallacies of Lower Levels

There is also a pre/trans fallacy (implicitly) associated with each of the "lower" levels.

The first task at L3 - using my terminology - is the successful differentiation of diagonal polarities. So the pre/trans fallacy here is the implicit confusion of pre and trans (and trans and pre) with respect to the diagonal polarities (due to a failure to properly differentiate them).

The main task at L2 is to successfully differentiate the vertical polarities. So the pre/trans fallacy now is the implicit confusion of pre and trans (and trans and pre) with respect to vertical polarities (again due to a failure of differentiation).

Finally the main task at L1 is the successful differentiation of horizontal polarities. So the pre/trans fallacy here is the implicit confusion of pre and trans (and trans and pre) with respect to remaining horizontal polarities.

So there is complementarity as between pre and trans (and trans and pre) at the "lower" levels.

The problem is that it is a confused complementarity (which corresponds with a failure in differentiation).

However once this confusion is resolved (at the middle level) the pre/trans fallacy takes a decidedly linear (i.e. asymmetrical) turn.