20 - Enhanced H3 Interpretations of H2, H1 and Vision-logic

We have a variety of enhanced interpretations to comment on here.

Firstly we have the H3 interpretation of H2.

Basically this appears similar to the H2 interpretation of H2 with the additional factor that cognitive and affective modes can be clearly differentiated.

For example the first of the H2 interpretations of H2 (with respect to the pre/trans fallacy was

ptf- 1  - the failure to realise that the "higher" state aspect of a transpersonal stage of reality is complementary with the "lower" structural aspect of the corresponding prepersonal stage.

Now the corresponding H3 interpretation of this H2 fallacy would have two forms (now differentiating affective and cognitive modes. These are

• ptf- 1  - the failure to realise that the "higher" state aspect of a transpersonal stage of reality (with respect to the cognitive mode) is complementary with the "lower" structural aspect of the corresponding prepersonal stage (with respect to the same mode).

• ptf- 2  - the failure to realise that the "higher" state aspect of a transpersonal stage of reality (with respect to the affective mode) is complementary with the "lower" structural aspect of the corresponding prepersonal stage (with respect to the same mode).

Then we have the H3 enhanced interpretation of H1

Remember the first example of the original H1 interpretation of H1 (with respect to the pre/trans fallacy)
 

ptf-1 - failure to realise that "higher" trans understanding (with respect to the exterior aspect) is complementary with "lower" pre understanding (in terms of the interior aspect).

 

This was then differentiated through the enhanced interpretation of H2 with respect to structures and states.

Thus taking the first of these (with respect to structures) the corresponding H2 interpretation of the H1 fallacy was
 

ptf-1 - failure to realise that "higher" trans understanding with respect to the exterior aspect (in its structure aspect) is complementary with "lower" pre understanding in terms of the interior aspect (in its structure aspect).

Now these fallacies are likewise differentiated with respect to exterior and interior aspects. So taking this first example the enhanced H3 interpretation of the H1 fallacy would have two expressions:
 

1 (a) ptf-1 - failure to realise that "higher" trans understanding with respect to the exterior aspect in its structure aspect using the cognitive mode is complementary with "lower" pre understanding in terms of the interior aspect in its structure aspect (using the same mode).

1 (b) ptf-1 - failure to realise that "higher" trans understanding with respect to the exterior aspect in its structure aspect using the affective mode is complementary with "lower" pre understanding in terms of the interior aspect in its structure aspect (using the same mode).
 

Finally we have enhanced interpretations of vision-logic from the perspective of H3

If we take the H2 enhanced interpretation of vision logic we saw that it gave four asymmetrical interpretations for each quadrant (two heterarchical, two hierarchical).

The H3 enhanced interpretation of vision-logic now gives eight asymmetrical interpretations for each quadrant (two of which are "real" and two "imaginary") .

The additional interpretations relate to combined interpretations of the "real" and "imaginary" (which can be done in four distinctive ways);

What this means in effect is that we simultaneously combine the conscious interpretation of one mode (e.g. cognitive) with the unconscious interpretation of the other (i.e. affective).