I enjoyed reading through your post, and agree that Wilber’s linear pre/trans fallacy is difficult to reconcile with his teaching’s regarding emptiness and its common ground as suchness (Non-dual). It appears you are on to something here, but I am unable to really get my arms around what you are trying to say regarding the interaction between pre/trans in the trans. circular and point levels. Could you please clarify the following statement for me:
 
 

"What is trans from the standpoint of the physical world (in relation to self) is pre from the standpoint of the psychological self (in relation to the world). Equally what is trans from the standpoint of the psychological self (in relation to the world) is pre from the standpoint of the physical world (in relation to self)."
 
 

Regards,
 
 

phil.